Skip navigation

Oh the cliches, let me count the ways....

The Fiery Redhead

The Brainy Brunette

The Dumb Blond

The Hot Blooded Hero

The Overbearing Father

And on and on and on….

Cliches, types, stereotypes, tropes. History and fiction has a million of them (and counting).  Some authors try to avert or subvert these, others embrace them, but they never seem to go out of style, unless certain unfortunate implications kick in (race, ethnicity and religion are the first ones that come to mind).

And the one place festooned with them is speculative fiction. The beautiful blond princess whispers of purity, the fiery redheaded fire wizard (redundant, but of course) screams of swift retribution against those that offend her (or her gender).  Combat leaders are supposed to be either a father figure to their men or complete bastard that cares nothing for their well being and gladly trade their lives for a few meters of real estate.

Many a reviewer whines every time the pop up on the page and asks themselves why, oh why did the author go the simplistic route. Some even profess to closing the book and throwing it in the garbage if a plucky sidekick shows up delivering a few lines of comic relief in the middle of the final battle.

Cliches are out, they tell us. A mortal sin to have one anywhere in your book.

You look at your manuscript and panic. But my heroine is a plucky non-sidekick redhead whose main weapon is…well…fire!

I iz doomed!

No u iz nots.

They’re multiple reasons why these cliches became cliches in the first place and why they continue to appear time and time again (and why TV Tropes is so popular).

  1. They are true. We met somebody who fits the description. Or heard about it from a third party.
  2. Two, they are easy to identify with. We know them and don’t need to spend a lot of time figuring them out.
  3. They are unavoidable. Unless you make an effort to deconstruct every single character trope, in every single situation you are not going to avoid. In fact you are liable to either fall into another cliche/trope (not the exactly the same but functionally so) or if you’re lucky enough, create a new one.

So what do can be done?

Simple, go deep!

Use the cliche/trope as the starting point for the character or situation. By giving the character a bit of depth you can avoid the shallowness of the cliche, which is really what ticks readers off. Giving the reader a cliche and nothing else smacks of laziness and lack of originality. Exploring the reason why the person fits (or not) said cliche shows that you respect your narrative and your reader(s).

 

 

Advertisements

2 Comments

    • bigwords88
    • Posted November 17, 2009 at 3:26 am
    • Permalink

    This Troper reserves the right not to insult the whole of France.

    “Cheese-eating surrender monkeys” never crossed my mind once. The story that they had a military crisis a couple of years ago, when the only factory in the country that produced white flags went on strike, is completely false. I’m even willing to bet that some women in that fine country even deem it necessary to shave their armpits.

    I refuse to pander to stereotypes. 😀

  1. Considering the casualties the French (and the rest of NATO forces) have taken in Afghanistan, I think that would be wise choice.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: